Washington v glucksberg 521 us 702,117 s ct 2258,117 s ct 2302 138 l ed 2d 772, the post-civil war amendments and civil rights legislation: constitutional restraints on private conduct congressional power to implement the amendments. Strickland v washington, 466 us 668 (1984), was a decision by the supreme court of the united states that established the standard for determining when a criminal defendant's sixth amendment right to counsel is violated by that counsel's inadequate performance.
Washington v texas case brief summary 388 us 14 (1967) case synopsis petitioner sought review by certiorari of a judgment of the texas court of criminal appeals which affirmed his conviction and sentence for murder with malice the trial court refused to allow petitioner to present testimony from a certain witness on the ground that tex.
Washington v texas, 388 us 14 (1967), is a united states supreme court case in which the court decided that the compulsory process clause of the sixth amendment to the constitution (guaranteeing the right of a criminal defendant to force the attendance of witnesses for their side) is applicable in state courts as well as federal courts. A summary and case brief of washington v texas, including the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents washington v. Audio transcription for oral argument - march 15, 1967 in washington v texas audio transcription for oral argument - march 16, 1967 in washington v.
Case opinion for us supreme court washington v texas read the court's full decision on findlaw.